Anker 735 Nano II
A2667 · 65W · 2 USB-C + 1 USB-A
Use USB-C1 and USB-C2; leave USB-A unused.
(paid link)
Give each device a power budget. See which two-port allocation covers the pair, and where to plug each cable.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Example result — replace these numbers with your devices' documented requirements.
Suggest a charger question → Include your device models, required watts and country.
A2667 · 65W · 2 USB-C + 1 USB-A
Use USB-C1 and USB-C2; leave USB-A unused.
(paid link)
3C1A wall charger · US model
Use USB-C1 and USB-C2; leave USB-C3 and USB-A unused.
(paid link)
US model · 3 USB-C + 1 USB-A
Use USB-C1 and USB-C3; leave USB-C2 and USB-A unused.
These are manufacturer-specified maximum allocations. Check compatible charging profiles and cables, use the named ports, and keep the other ports unused. A third device changes the sharing arrangement.
We try both port assignments. A pair fits only when each requested wattage is at or below its port's documented budget. Among fitting options, the smaller combined budget comes first. This does not rank prices or guarantee charging behavior.
If your existing chargers already meet both requirements, a new shared charger may be unnecessary. These comparisons cover Anker A2667, UGREEN 100W 3C1A and Anker A2697. The A2697 uses different pairs for 100 + 40 W and 70 + 70 W; follow the selected port assignment. Other generations need their own allocation table.
| Charger | Port / budget | Port / budget |
|---|---|---|
| Anker 735 Nano IIA2667 · 65W · 2 USB-C + 1 USB-A | USB-C1: 45 W | USB-C2: 20 W |
| UGREEN Nexode 100W3C1A wall charger · US model | USB-C1: 65 W | USB-C2: 30 W |
| Anker 140W A2697US model · 3 USB-C + 1 USB-A | USB-C1: 100 W | USB-C3: 40 W |
| Anker 140W A2697US model · 3 USB-C + 1 USB-A | USB-C1: 70 W | USB-C2: 70 W |
Source review: September 10, 2026